“Let's just be friends.”

The worst and yet the most common line in the history of break-ups, and it was coming my way. “No, we can't just be friends,” I wanted to say. “We've been through so much together, and knowing how I still feel about you, how can you even suggest such a thing?” was what was on my mind.

“Sure,” was what I said, instead.

There were two inherent reasons for my choosing to go along with her, other than the fact that it was the best one word response I could think of at that time. First, of course, the gravity of the situation escaped me at that moment, and 'friends' I felt was a loose enough term to suggest that we would be keeping in touch, though about what I did not dare to question at that point. Second and more importantly, I felt that something was better than nothing, and if I said no now, I was likely to lose her entirely.

Yes, saying 'yes' was surely the right way to go.

Now, the very concept of friends who were previously in a relationship needs to be more clearly defined. If we go out together, would it be a date or would we be hanging out? How often can I expect to hear from her now that the relationship rights have been revoked, and yes, of course, the most important of all -- how am I expected to react if she tells me about or introduces me to her new boyfriend? Complex situations, which require simple answers.

No, this may not quite have been the right way to go.

My distress was compounded further by the fact that every time we spoke, she would not only bring up the past, but discuss it at length and create issues about things that were in effect no longer relevant. 'Analysis paralysis' I believe it's called in technical terms. On top of all this, I wasn't quite getting the hang of 'chilling' on the relationship that, of course, was now a friendship, and I found myself too worried, too hassled and too involved in the things she said and did.

Dear, oh dear, this is certainly not turning out to be the right way to go.

Distress morphed into desperation as we began drifting apart. No, wait a second. She was the one drifting and I was the one holding on.

“Why haven't you been replying to my mails?” I pestered, one day.

“I've been busy,” she replied matter of factly.

“Too busy to send me back even a one-liner?” I snapped.

Oops, was there a line somewhere there that I had just stepped over? By the look on her face, I'd say there probably was. The lines were hazy, the rules unwritten and the mistakes were piling up.

I don't think this had been the right way to go.

It is anguish when the final bombshell drops, and lo and behold, there's someone else in her life. She gives the news calmly, and waits for the expected response of: “I'm so happy for you.” Tears filled up my eyes, pain takes over my heart and yet I say the words expected of me. “That's great news. I'm so happy for you.”

And when it finally sinks in that I'm really not that happy for her, I realize that I never really wanted to be friends either. I already had enough friends, I recollected. But with her, I had always had more than friendship on my mind.

Yes, I'm sure it had been the wrong way to go.

There are broadly two schools of thought as far as handling break-ups are concerned. One believes that a clean break should be made. Make a decision, say your goodbyes and then snap, cut all ties in one quick motion and never look back at your past. The other school of thought believes that a gradual severance of ties makes for a smoother transition phase that eases the pain somewhat.

I believe that the breaker is always part of the first school whereas the breakee is part of the second. The reason is simple. The breaker wants to move on while the breakee wants to hold on. To some little hope or thread or illusion. The breaker accepts the pain, the breakee delays it. And then of course there are those breakers who simply don't know how to break-up, so they end with either a “Let's be friends” or “I'll give you a call sometime.”

This essentially depends upon the feelings of both at the time of break-up. If it was mutual, then maybe they could be friends. But then, whether a break-up could actually ever be mutual is a debate in itself. However, if one still has feelings for the other, rest assured that friendship might work but only at the cost of some major heartache for at least one of the two.

Breaking up is hard to do
    For you loved me and I loved you.

Holding on is harder still
    For you are drifting as I stand still.

But saying goodbye is by far the worst
    For it's only in the end that it truly hurts.
 
 
 
In any case, if you do have to break-up, what is a good way to go? Can a guy and girl who've had a relationship actually still be friends or even want to be friends?

ya sure Suhaas!!..

depends on two of them....love is respect....frienship is respect isnt it??

all relations n feelings of mankind r mutually interrelated...u cant apart one from other.......base is same.....to giv ur best n do gud to others...

hehe...k .... soheb not suhas :-p

xactly .... but as said earlier ... it will be quite difficult to see ur beloved with somone else ... thats when the jealousy n all might creep in ... and will be difficult 2 continue with the friendship ... how can one be happy after seeing that the person keeping his sweethrt happy is not him but some other guy ...

having someone as a friend is better than not having them at all in your life...

i didnt quote u here mansi. i was just giving some views. in my views, theres no probs having sumone as a frend after prob. y one shud try to end up everything?.........!!!

Having someone break up wid you saying "we can still be friends", is like having your dog die and your mom saying "well you can still keep it".

hee hee hee hee dono mil ke mujhe tang kar rahe ho :evil:

whts the prob. in having a relation of "frendship" with sumone after breakup. y say bye? whts the prob in having him/her as a frend... kuch ghat jayega kya? lol